鈥淭ake nothing but photographs, leave nothing but footprints, kill nothing but time鈥 鈥 this is the mantra that a lot of聽nature photographers live by, but the increase in popularity of聽wildlife photography has caused a host of by photographers all wanting to get the best shot.
Being a Zoologist myself I feel very strongly about the ethics of wildlife photography and I thought it would be a good idea to highlight some of the main areas of unethical practice.
Baiting
is one of the most hotly debated topics among wildlife photographers and its meaning can be interpreted in different ways. When we talk about baiting, we鈥檙e usually referring to the act of leaving food out for animals to lure them into certain situations but really it extends to anything that creates a situation that the animal wouldn鈥檛 have been in otherwise – for example using and remote control devices.
From a conservationist point of view baiting is a big no no and is illegal in some places – you should be documenting animal behaviour, not creating situations. Some photographers may disagree and have the view that putting out a bit of food for an animal isn鈥檛 hurting it, but baiting can have a much more than you might think.
that constantly leaving food out for animals can cause them to become dependent on these meals and to lose their natural instinct to fear humans. Worst case scenarios mean animals will become aggressive towards humans and such acts are often followed by culling. Opportunistic baiting of wild animals聽can also聽cause malnutrition and even death. You might think that leaving a little bit of food out won鈥檛 cause anything too drastic but imagine if everyone had the exact same view, the results don鈥檛 look great for the animal involved.
Do not disturb
When scoping out the perfect landscape to get your shot it’s essential you don鈥檛 disturb the area. If there鈥檚 an annoying stalk, branch or shrub in your way then move somewhere else. The shrub was there before you so best to leave it be. Removing anything from the area could be detrimental especially if there are nests involved. This could expose eggs or baby animals to predators which is certainly not what we want.
Don’t get too close! This goes without saying and is for your own safety as well as the animals’. There have been far too many when it comes to photographers getting up close and personal. If you want that perfect portrait then make sure you’ve got yourself a good .
Silence is golden when it comes to wildlife photography. Not only will it increase your chances of actually seeing something but animals take their beauty sleep very seriously so keep the noise down, ‘wake not a sleeping lion’ should be taken literally! It鈥檚 not just animals that this rule applies to but fellow photographers as well. There鈥檚 nothing more annoying than hours of patience being ruined by someone who thinks chatting about what happened at the weekend is more important than your blue tit shot.
Faking it
Unethical wildlife photography isn鈥檛 just limited to acts that are detrimental to the animals and their behaviour. Making an audience believe the image is 鈥榬eal鈥 when it isn鈥檛 could potentially be seen as unethical.
I won鈥檛 hear a bad word said against Sir David Attenborough but even he has been in trouble for his misleading narrative in the BBC series 鈥, where viewers were led to believe two polar bear cubs shown in a den were actually in the Arctic but in fact the scene was filmed in a zoo. Sure, it could have been unethical and quite frankly incredibly dangerous to film a wild polar bear den but the misleading nature is what bought anger to some viewers.
Another well-known example is the 2009 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winner whose image, dubbed 鈥榣oan wolf鈥, was disqualified after it was later revealed that the wolf in question was trained and not wild at all.
There are other methods that some photographers would class as ‘cheating’ or ‘faking it’, for example . You could argue that there is no skill in setting up your camera, popping home for a cuppa, and then coming back to find a great photograph but in my opinion there is nothing wrong with it, as long as you are not disturbing or harming the animals in any way but you do need to be honest about how you got that shot.
In reality the key to a successful wildlife photograph is an awful lot of patience, observation skills,聽and probably the same amount of luck. has some great tips on how to get a great wildlife photo the ethical way.
Do you have an opinion on what’s ethical and what isn’t? We would love to know!